Corporate Governance, Audit and Standards Committee - Monday, 21st March, 2016 7.00 pm - Agenda and minutes
Venue: Council Offices, Farnborough
Contact: Committee Administrator, Kathy Flatt Tel. (01252 398829) or email kathy.flatt@rushmoor.gov.uk
No. | Item | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
To confirm the Minutes of the Meeting held on 25th January, 2016 (copy attached). Minutes: The Minutes of the Meeting held on 25th January, 2016 were approved and signed by the Chairman. |
|||||||
EXTERNAL AUDIT UPDATES PDF 86 KB To
consider the Head of Financial Services’ Report No. FIN1606 (copy attached)
which introduces the following reports which have been
prepared by the Council’s external auditors, Ernst & Young: (1) Annual
External Audit Plan for 2015-16 (2) Sector
Briefing (3) Value for Money Update Mr. Adrian Balmer (Manager, Government and Public Sector) and Mr. Andrew Brittain (Executive Director) of Ernst & Young LLP will be in attendance for this item. Minutes: The
Committee received the Head of Financial Services’ Report No. FIN1606, which
explained that the Council’s appointed auditors, Ernst & Young, would be
undertaking the audit of Rushmoor’s financial
statements for 2015/16 in order to give an audit opinion on those statements
and to provide a value for money conclusion on the Council’s arrangements to
secure economy, efficiency and effectiveness. The
Chairman welcomed to the meeting Mr. Andrew Brittain
(Executive Director) and Mr. Adrian Balmer (Manager,
Government and Private Sector) of Ernst & Young, who provided the following
updates: (1) Value for money – Mr. Brittain advised that, as external auditor, Ernst &
Young was required to consider whether the Council had ‘proper arrangements’ to
secure economy, efficiency and effectiveness on its use of resources. For
2015/16 this would be based on the overall evaluation criterion: “In
all significant respects, the audited body had proper arrangements to ensure it
took properly informed decisions and deployed resources to achieve planned and
sustainable outcomes for taxpayers and local people.” In
considering the Council’s proper arrangements, the auditor would draw on the
requirements of the CIPFA/SOLACE framework for local government to ensure that
its assessment was made against this framework and to carry out this work
taking into account a variety of sources of evidence, including internal audit
reports, key financial information and reports, risk registers and the Annual
Governance Statement and Annual Report. The auditor would be required to
determine whether there were any risks that could be considered significant and
this would determine the nature and extent of any further work. Examples of
potential significant risks included: organisational change and transformation;
significant funding gaps in financial planning; legislative and policy changes;
and, repeated financial difficulties or persistently poor performance. The
Committee was advised of the process to be followed by Ernst & Young in
reporting to the Council on the audit work. Mr. Brittain then answered Members’ questions on the level of
balances to be maintained by the Council and the Business Rates Retention
Scheme. (2) Audit Plan 2015/16 – Mr. Balmer reported to the Committee on the Audit Plan which
set out the proposed audit approach and scope for the 2015/16 audit and
summarised the auditor’s assessment of any key risks to be considered as part
of the opinion work. The Audit Plan would cover the following areas: ·
financial
statement risks ·
value for money
risks ·
the audit process
and strategy ·
independence ·
audit fees for
the 2015/16 audit ·
communications
required with those charged with governance It
was noted that the Committee would receive a progress report in June and that
the audit results and value for money conclusion would be presented to the
Committee in September. (3) Local government audit committee briefing paper - The
Committee received a copy of the latest edition of the quarterly briefing paper
which had been produced by Ernst & Young for local government audit
committees. The Committee’s attention was drawn to the article regarding the closing of accounts. Currently, the Council’s accounts had to be signed off by the end ... view the full minutes text for item 22. |
|||||||
DRAFT FOOD AND HEALTH AND SAFETY SERVICE PLAN 2016/17 PDF 143 KB To consider the Head of Environmental Health and Housing’s Report No. EHH1604 (copy attached), which seeks comments on the draft combined Food/Health and Safety Service Plan for 2016/17, which will also be reported to the Cabinet on 29th March, 2016. Minutes: The
Committee considered the Head of Environmental Health and Housing’s Report No. EHH1604 which sought comments on the Council’s draft
combined Food Safety and Health and Safety Service Plan 2016/17. It was
reported that the Council was required to produce annual Food Safety and Health and Safety Service Plans in accordance
with guidance issued by the Food Standards Agency and the Health and Safety
Executive respectively. Subject to the views of the Committee, the combined
Service Plan would be submitted to the Cabinet for
approval prior to a period of public consultation with local businesses and
business organisations. The
Committee noted that the draft Service Plan had been prepared taking into
account continuing Government reviews of regulatory services to reduce red
tape, to support businesses in the current economic climate and to deliver risk
based interventions. The Service Plan responded to the
Council’s 8- Point Plan for financial sustainability and had developed
opportunities for income generation and cost recovery. In addition, by
reviewing the service on an annual basis through service planning, the
opportunity had arisen for officers and Members to check the service remained
fit for purpose. The Service Plan also reflected a strong link to the Council’s
purpose and themes, recognised the Council’s aim to work with others to
“improve the quality of people’s lives”, supporting “an equal right for people
to live healthy lives, in safe, clean and sustainable places”. Members’
questions were answered in respect of who was
responsible for reporting unsafe working practices, the Farnborough Air Show
and hygiene ratings. RESOLVED: That the Cabinet be recommended to approve the draft combined Food Safety and Health and Safety Service Plan for 2016/17 for consultation with local businesses and business organisations, as set out in the Head of Environmental Health and Housing’s Report No. EHH1604. |
|||||||
OFFICER EMPLOYMENT PROCEDURE RULES PDF 232 KB To consider a report on proposed changes to the Officer Employment Procedure Rules to reflect recent changes to regulations (copy to follow). Minutes: The
Committee considered the Head of Democratic and Customer Services’ Report No.
DCS1603, which sought approval to recommend to the full Council the adoption of
revised Officer Employment Procedure Rules following recent legislative
changes. The
Report advised that the Government had made legislative changes which required
the Council to amend its Standing Orders (contained within the Officer
Employment Procedure Rules in Part 4 of the Council’s Constitution) relating to
the processes for disciplinary action applying to the Council’s Head of Paid
Service, Monitoring Officer and Chief Finance Officer. The new statutory
provisions meant that any decision to dismiss a statutory chief officer had to
have the approval of the full Council by way of a vote. Before taking that decision,
the Council would have to invite at least two Independent Persons to be members
of a Panel and the Council had to take into account any recommendation of that
Panel before taking a final decision to dismiss. Members
were further advised by the Solicitor to the Council that, in updating the new
provisions contained in the Local Authorities (Standing Orders) (England)
(Amendment) Regulations 2015, the opportunity had been taken to review and
refresh the Officer Employment Procedure Rules as a whole to ensure clarity
around arrangements for appointments. It was noted that some elements of the
Procedure Rules relating to general responsibilities of the Head of Paid
Service had been deleted from the revised version as these general staffing
responsibilities would be covered in future within the Council’s Scheme of
Delegation. RESOLVED: That the Council be recommended to approve the revised Officer Employment Procedure Rules, as set out in the Head of Democratic and Customer Services’ Report No. DCS1603, for adoption as part of the Council’s Constitution. |
|||||||
FILM CLASSIFICATION UNDER THE LICENSING ACT 2003 PDF 61 KB To consider the Solicitor to the Council’s Report No. LEG1603 (copy attached), which seeks authority for the functions under the Licensing Act 2003 with respect to the classification of films to be delegated to the Licensing Sub-Committee (Alcohol and Entertainments). The Report further proposes that, for public consistency, any classification of films by the licensing authority should be based on current British Board of Film Classification classifications and guidelines. Minutes: The
Committee considered the Solicitor to the Council’s Report No. LEG1603 which sought approval for powers relating to the
classification of films to be delegated to the Licensing Sub-Committee (Alcohol
and Entertainments). The Committee was advised that, under the Localism Act
2003, where a premises licence or club premises certificate authorised the
exhibition of a film, it must include a mandatory condition requiring the
admission of children to films to be restricted in accordance with
recommendations given either by a body designated under Section 4 of the Video
Recording Act 1984 specified in the licence (the British Board of Film
Classification was the only body which had been so designated) or by the licensing
authority. If a licence or
certificate holder wished to show a film that had not been
classified by the British Board of Film Classification, responsibility
for viewing the film and making recommendations would fall on the licensing
authority. In the circumstance of this being the licensing authority, Members
would need to watch the whole film and issue a classification, which would be
applicable only within the Borough of Rushmoor. Any
classification would be based on current British Board
of Film Classification guidance. RESOLVED: That (i) approval be given to the
functions under the Localism Act 2003 with respect to the classification of
films being delegated to the Licensing Sub-Committee (Alcohol and
Entertainments); and (ii)
for public consistency, any classification of films by
the licensing authority be based on current British Board of Film
Classification classifications and guidance. |
|||||||
AMALGAMATION OF THE LICENSING AND GENERAL PURPOSES AND THE STANDARDS AND AUDIT COMMITTEES PDF 123 KB To consider the Head of Democratic and Customer Services’ Report No. DCS1602 (copy attached), which proposes the amalgamation of the Licensing and General Purposes and the Standards and Audit Committees. Minutes: The
Committee considered the Head of Democratic and Customer Services’ Report No.
DCS1602, which recommended the amalgamation of the Licensing and General
Purposes Committee and the Standards and Audit Committee to take effect from
the start of the 2016/17 Municipal Year. Members
were advised that a review had recently been carried out of the decision making
structure, which had been prompted by comments made over the previous two years
by the Council’s external auditors, Ernst & Young. The auditor’s view was
that effective Member oversight of governance issues was not
best facilitated by the split in governance
responsibilities between the two Committees and had recommended that, in line
with best practice, the oversight and consideration of governance issues,
associated with internal control, risk management and financial reporting,
would be best assigned to one committee. It was therefore proposed that the committees should be
amalgamated within the structure of the Licensing and General Purposes
Committee. The Committee would not have co-opted members, however the role of
the Independent Person to advise on issues relating to
standards would remain in place. The
Committee noted that the amalgamation of Committees would result in a small
saving in terms of administration and allowance costs of approximately £3,000. If approved at the full Council Meeting on 21st April, 2016, arrangements would be made for implementation
to commence from the Annual Meeting of the Council. Consequential changes would
need to be made to the Constitution to reflect the new
arrangements, including a change to Standing Orders. It would also be necessary
to suspend Standing Orders at the Annual Meeting of the Council to effect the
change for 2016/17 at the Annual Meeting. RESOLVED: That the full Council be recommended at its meeting on 21st April, 2016 to approve the amalgamation of the Licensing and General Purposes Committee and the Standards and Audit Committee to take effect from the start of the 2016/17 Municipal Year and that the necessary consequential changes be made to the Constitution. |
|||||||
EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC To
consider resolving: That,
taking into account the public interest test, the public be excluded from this
meeting during the discussion of the undermentioned item to avoid the
disclosure of exempt information within the paragraph of Schedule 12A to the
Local Government Act, 1972 indicated against such item: Agenda Item No. Schedule
12A Category 8 1 (Information relating to an individual) Minutes: RESOLVED: That, taking into account the public interest test,
the public be excluded from the meeting during the discussion of the
undermentioned item to avoid the disclosure of exempt information within the
paragraph of Schedule 12A to the Local Government Act, 1972, indicated against
such item:
|
|||||||
COMMUNITY AWARD 2016 - NOMINATIONS PDF 139 KB To consider the Head of Democratic Services’ Report No. DCS1601 (copy attached) on the nominations received for the Community Award 2016. Minutes: The
Committee considered the Head of Democratic and Customer Services’ Report No.
DCS1601, which provided details of nominations received for Rushmoor’s
Community Award 2016. The Report gave details of how the scheme had been
publicised and gave details of the criteria against which nominations would be assessed and compared. The Report explained that
the purpose of the scheme was to recognise outstanding achievements in the
Borough by local people and particularly to mark long-term commitment. It was agreed that, in future, the importance of the long-term
aspect of this voluntary work in the community would be stressed as a criterion
on the nomination form. Members
discussed the merits of the nominations which had been
set out in an exempt appendix to the Report, taking account of the advice from
the Head of Democratic and Customer Services. After careful consideration of
the nominations received, the Committee agreed that Mr. Lewis Trinder and Mr. Kevin Matthew should each
be selected for the Award. In the case of Mr. Trinder,
this would be in recognition of his fundraising and contribution to the
community over many decades, making a real difference and providing a fine
example to others. In the case of Mr. Matthew, this would be in recognition of
his significant fundraising and community support over 30 years. RESOLVED: That Mr. Lewis Trinder and Mr. Kevin Matthew be selected to receive Rushmoor’s Community Award 2016. |