To
consider the Head of Financial Services’ Report No. FIN1606 (copy attached)
which introduces the following reports which have been
prepared by the Council’s external auditors, Ernst & Young:
(1) Annual
External Audit Plan for 2015-16
(2) Sector
Briefing
(3) Value for Money Update
Mr. Adrian Balmer (Manager, Government and Public Sector) and Mr. Andrew Brittain (Executive Director) of Ernst & Young LLP will be in attendance for this item.
Minutes:
The
Committee received the Head of Financial Services’ Report No. FIN1606, which
explained that the Council’s appointed auditors, Ernst & Young, would be
undertaking the audit of Rushmoor’s financial
statements for 2015/16 in order to give an audit opinion on those statements
and to provide a value for money conclusion on the Council’s arrangements to
secure economy, efficiency and effectiveness.
The
Chairman welcomed to the meeting Mr. Andrew Brittain
(Executive Director) and Mr. Adrian Balmer (Manager,
Government and Private Sector) of Ernst & Young, who provided the following
updates:
(1) Value for money –
Mr. Brittain advised that, as external auditor, Ernst &
Young was required to consider whether the Council had ‘proper arrangements’ to
secure economy, efficiency and effectiveness on its use of resources. For
2015/16 this would be based on the overall evaluation criterion:
“In
all significant respects, the audited body had proper arrangements to ensure it
took properly informed decisions and deployed resources to achieve planned and
sustainable outcomes for taxpayers and local people.”
In
considering the Council’s proper arrangements, the auditor would draw on the
requirements of the CIPFA/SOLACE framework for local government to ensure that
its assessment was made against this framework and to carry out this work
taking into account a variety of sources of evidence, including internal audit
reports, key financial information and reports, risk registers and the Annual
Governance Statement and Annual Report. The auditor would be required to
determine whether there were any risks that could be considered significant and
this would determine the nature and extent of any further work. Examples of
potential significant risks included: organisational change and transformation;
significant funding gaps in financial planning; legislative and policy changes;
and, repeated financial difficulties or persistently poor performance.
The
Committee was advised of the process to be followed by Ernst & Young in
reporting to the Council on the audit work.
Mr. Brittain then answered Members’ questions on the level of
balances to be maintained by the Council and the Business Rates Retention
Scheme.
(2) Audit Plan 2015/16 –
Mr. Balmer reported to the Committee on the Audit Plan which
set out the proposed audit approach and scope for the 2015/16 audit and
summarised the auditor’s assessment of any key risks to be considered as part
of the opinion work. The Audit Plan would cover the following areas:
·
financial
statement risks
·
value for money
risks
·
the audit process
and strategy
·
independence
·
audit fees for
the 2015/16 audit
·
communications
required with those charged with governance
It
was noted that the Committee would receive a progress report in June and that
the audit results and value for money conclusion would be presented to the
Committee in September.
(3) Local government audit committee briefing paper -
The
Committee received a copy of the latest edition of the quarterly briefing paper
which had been produced by Ernst & Young for local government audit
committees.
The
Committee’s attention was drawn to the article regarding the closing of
accounts. Currently, the Council’s accounts had to be signed off by the end of
September each year. From 2017/18 this would change to the end of July. This
would impact on governance processes at the Council for receiving the auditor’s
report and approving the accounts.
RESOLVED: That the Head of Financial Services’ Report No. FIN1606, together with the appended reports from Ernst & Young, be noted.
Supporting documents: