To consider
the Joint Report (No. DC2109 – copy attached) of the Head of Democracy and
Community and the Monitoring Officer, which sets out proposals for the future
arrangements for the Committee.
Minutes:
The
Committee considered the Joint Report of the Head of Democracy and Community
and the Monitoring Officer (Report No. DC2109), which proposed changes to ensure
the future effectiveness of the Committee, with a strong focus on its corporate
governance role providing oversight, protection and public confidence in
Council activities.
In
introducing the Report, the Monitoring Officer explained that the Council,
along with many other authorities within the sector, had been diversifying its
range of activities to both mitigate the risk of financial restructuring as a
result of Central Government funding changes, and to facilitate the Council to
take a much stronger role in place shaping and to influence the regeneration of
the area. In order to deliver against
this more diversified agenda, the Council had sought to establish key delivery
vehicles such as the Rushmoor Development Partnership to pursue regeneration
and Rushmoor Homes Ltd to deliver local housing solutions. The Council had also sought to become more
commercially focused in seeking out income generating sources and had
considered a wide range of commercial income investment opportunities. All of these areas of activity required good
governance, careful oversight and risk management, supported with transparent
arrangements to provide the public oversight, protection and confidence
necessary. It was felt that high quality
Elected Member oversight was a pivotal lynchpin to providing that public
confidence.
The Report
advised that the Council was keen to build on lessons learned by high profile
local authority failures, especially in respect of the role of corporate
governance, use of expertise and independence and the approach to risk
management and transparent decision making.
The Report
set out proposals to implement arrangements for the Licensing, Audit and
General Purposes Committee to help ensure and support the Committee’s
effectiveness in the future. The
proposed arrangements were:
·
Committee Name – It was proposed to change of the Committee’s name to ‘Corporate
Governance, Audit and Standards Committee’, which was a more accurate
reflection of the Committee’s work and focus.
This would take effect from the first meeting of the new Municipal Year
in May 2021.
·
Terms of Reference and Statement of Purpose - It was proposed to add a new Statement of
Purpose as an introduction to the Committee’s terms of reference to bring
greater focus to the corporate governance and audit role. This was set out in Appendix 1 to the Report.
·
Membership –
It was proposed to continue the membership of the Committee as 11 Members
(non-executive and politically balanced) with a new provision to appoint up to
three additional non-voting, co-opted Independent Members. These Independent Members would be invited to
join meetings for discussion on all corporate governance and audit matters.
·
Independent Members – It was proposed to follow good practice, which showed that for
committees with audit responsibilities, the co-option of independent members
with technical knowledge and expertise could be beneficial, helping with the
process of in-depth questioning and committee discussion. A copy of the Person Specification for
Independent Members was set out in Appendix 3 to the Report.
A public advertisement to recruit
Independent Members would be published during April 2021 with a view to
recommending an appointment for confirmation at the Annual Council Meeting in
2021.
It was proposed that the following
terms would apply to the appointment of Independent Members:
-
A
fixed term of three years, with provision for early termination or extension of
the appointment
-
The
Independent Member would be eligible to be paid an allowance equal to the
statutory co-optee allowance (currently £514 per year)
-
The
Independent Member would be expected to follow the same code of conduct as
Elected Members and with the register of interests.
The
Committee was advised that role descriptions had been prepared for the Chairman
and Members of the Committee, as set out in Appendix 2 to the Report. It was noted that the role descriptions
referenced the apolitical and independent nature of the Committee and a requirement
for Committee members to have an interest in corporate governance matters. It also emphasised a commitment to
participate in training events to ensure knowledge and understanding of the
Committee’s key areas of responsibility.
Members noted that the updated role descriptions would be incorporated
in Part 3 of the Council’s Constitution (Section 10 – Councillor Role
Descriptions).
It was
advised that, during 2021/22 it was proposed to deliver an enhanced programme
of learning and development support for Members on the Committee, based on the
training modules set out in Appendix 4 to the Report.
It was
proposed to review the new arrangements in a year when the Committee would have
had some experience of the changes. In
these circumstances, it was not intended to recommend that Standing Orders for
the Regulation of Business be changed but to ask full Council to suspend
Standing Orders at the Annual Council Meeting so that the new arrangements
could be introduced for 2021/22. Once
the review had been undertaken, the proposed changes to Standing Orders could
be formalised in the early part of 2022.
During
discussion, Members agreed that changes were needed due to the growing
complexity of matters dealt with by the Committee and it was felt that the
proposals were a good way forward. The
view was expressed that, in view of the onerous duties to be imposed on Members
of the Committee, including in-depth training to be undertaken and the level of
ability required, that a special responsibility allowance should be given to
Members of the Committee. Following
consideration of the suggestion it was agreed by the Committee that the Council
should also be recommended to appoint an Independent Remuneration Panel to
examine whether a Special Responsibility Allowance should be paid to Members of
the Committee.
During
further discussion, Members raised questions regarding the apolitical and
independent nature of the Committee particularly in relation to corporate
governance matters and how this might not always be possible. It was also requested that Members of the
Committee should have access to a list of financial management terminology and
their meanings.
In response
to a question regarding training, it was explained that undertaking the
training programme would ensure that Members were confident that they could not
only take an independent view on the advice of professional officers but also
could challenge, question and really get to grips with the information
submitted for consideration and in so doing be satisfied that they were happy
with the information provided.
RESOLVED:
(1) That the COUNCIL BE RECOMMENDED to
approve
(a)
the
Committee’s name change to ‘Corporate Governance, Audit and Standards
Committee’ from the Annual Council Meeting in May 2021;
(b)
updates
to the Council’s Constitution to incorporate a new Statement of Purpose to
precede the Committee’s terms of reference, as set out in Appendix 1 to the
Report; and the updated Role Descriptions, as set out in Appendices 2 and 3;
(c)
the
suspension of Standing Orders for the Regulation of Business at the Annual
Council Meeting to enable the proposals set out in the Report to be implemented
for 2021/22; and
(d)
the
appointment of an Independent Remuneration Panel to assess the duties of the
Members and Chairman of the new Committee and make recommendations regarding a
Special Responsibility Allowance; and
(2) RESOLVED: That
(a) arrangements to recruit Independent Member(s)
be based on the approach and terms set out in paragraphs 3.7 and 3.8 of the
Report be agreed; and
(b) the implementation of a Members’
training programme for the Committee in 2021/22, based on the modules set out
in Appendix 4 to the Report, be approved.
Supporting documents: