To receive an overview from Mr. Jamie Beaton, Community Development Worker, on the Bill Sergeant Trust Report on food banks and to receive updates from representatives from local food bank facilities within the Borough.
Minutes:
The
Panel welcomed Mr. Jamie Beaton, Community Development Worker, Mrs. Jane
Newton, The Larder, Holy Trinity Church, Aldershot and Mr. Mike Shea, Farnborough Foodbank, who had all been invited to
attend the meeting to give an update on Foodbanks at a county and local level.
Mr.
Beaton commenced by giving an overview of the report commissioned by the Bill
Sargent Trust on the work of foodbanks in Hampshire. A seminar had been held in
Winchester in July, 2015 which had been attended by representatives from
foodbanks, housing associations, voluntary organisations and Officers and
Members for local councils and the County Council. It was advised that, whilst
Hampshire contained some of the most affluent areas in the United Kingdom, it
had also experienced a remarkable rise in foodbank provision and use. It was
reported that there were at least 20 foodbanks or similar projects in
Hampshire, including some in a number of the wealthiest areas. The research in
the report contained information from eleven foodbanks in the County from which
workers, users and volunteers had been interviewed; therefore, it was a small
scale study and the findings should be considered in that context. Users
interviewed were of mixed gender and reflected users presenting with complex
issues such as mental health issues, learning disabilities, physical health
issues, and substance abuse.
It was
noted that most users hit crisis point before asking for assistance, triggers
included benefit delays, changes to benefits, jobcentre sanctions, reductions
in working hours and prolonged periods of illness. Most people would cope,
until that final crisis trigger pushed them to ask for extra help, but users
generally felt ashamed and embarrassed at having to ask. It was noted that
budgeting was rarely considered an issue; most users, volunteers and workers
had reported that, despite careful budgeting and frugal living, most users
incomes, be it wages or benefits, had not provided enough to meet their basic
needs
The
Panel noted that benefits sanctions emerged strongly as a theme, within the
report, as a tipping point for crisis. Stories, from users, suggested that
individuals were ending up in crisis after being sanctioned as a result of
unavoidable circumstances, such as prolonged periods of illness and
hospitalisation. In addition to sanctions, some individuals were slipping
through the safety net of support altogether due to the rigid rules and
procedures of support agencies and a lack of flexibility or tailoring of
support to individual circumstances. As a result, people could fall deeper into
arrears, with rent and bills creating more debt. A lack of knowledge of
entitlements might also be causing issues.
Foodbanks
had a practical impact on users, often providing food packages to individuals
who had gone for some time with very little or inadequate food. Users often
suffered from low self-esteem, anger, frustration and a sense of helplessness,
not knowing where they would find the money to feed their families. In some
cases, individuals had no other support network than the foodbank and felt
isolated and lonely.
The
Panel was advised of the different ways in which individuals tried to avoid
crisis, even though a few users regarded foodbanks as part of their regular
landscape of support, most did everything they could to avoid needing food
parcels. Several users commented on how they lived frugally and budgeted
carefully, in one case, an individual had considered declaring themselves
bankrupt, some actively sought work, and others sought to save whatever they
could to help clear their debts. Often users wanted to give something back by
volunteering to help at their local foodbank, others gave financial
contributions once they were more financially stable.
It was
reported that the use of foodbanks had increased in recent years but appeared
to have plateaued in the last twelve months. An increasing number of families
with children and people on low incomes had sought help and it had become
common to see the “working poor” asking for help. As foodbanks had grown, some
had extended their offer to include fresh food stuffs, toiletries and clothing
and some had had to take on paid staff and were now renting or borrowing
premises.
It was
advised that most foodbanks operated on a voucher system or referral basis,
meaning that most clients had to be approved before receiving help. Referral
agencies included school staff, GPs and housing and welfare advisers. The
relationship with Jobcentres varied across the County with some reported as
refusing to issue vouchers and make referrals and others more willing to refer
their clients. On occasions, foodbank workers would use their discretion and
would help users who had not been referred or gave extra help to those in
particular need. In addition, foodbank staff, when appropriate, would signpost
clients to other sources of help.
It was
noted that, whilst a foodbank could offer a lifeline in times of crisis, the
help that could be offered was limited. There was little capacity for service
users to resolve entrenched and long term problems and foodbank staff were
aware of their limitations and had clear boundaries of what they could and
could not do.
The
Report had identified that accommodation had become an issue for most foodbank
providers and eight of the eleven interviewed had mentioned this as an issue.
It was noted that food was being stored in various places including shipping
containers, rented space and, in one case, a vacant shopping centre unit.
The
Panel was informed that the general consensus was that foodbanks would be
required in Hampshire for many years to come, if not permanently. Interviewees
suggested that a form of social breakdown might be to blame for the need and
sited fragmentation of family life and traditional roles, and the disappearance
of basic skills such as cooking and budgeting as contributing factors to the
breakdown. When posed with a question about the future of foodbanks in
Hampshire, a number of questions were raised, including:
·
What role should foodbanks in Hampshire
play in the wider network of social support?
·
Should relationships with statutory and
voluntary agencies become closer?
·
Should foodbanks collect and share more
data so that it is possible to understand trends and challenges on a
county-wide basis?
·
Given the strong view among foodbank workers
that need will continue and may grow, were Hampshire’s food banks equipped to
sustain their work?
·
Do foodbanks have the capacity and
resource to cope with unexpected demands?
·
Do foodbanks need a better understanding
of the current and emerging policy context
The
Panel discussed the report and commented on the size of the study and the need
to acquire more data, to gain a better picture of the situation in the county
and at a local level.
Mrs.
Newton addressed the Panel on the working arrangements of “The Larder”, which
was run from the Holy Trinity Church, Aldershot. It was advised that The Larder
was the only foodbank provision in Aldershot since the closure of the Kings
Church, which had provided a similar service. The Larder had been operating for
the last 7–8 years and worked on a referral basis only. Food came via donations
from the Church and from local schools, especially at harvest time, and had
been stored in a cupboard in the Church Hall.
It was
noted that all parcels were hand delivered to individuals and currently 3-4
parcels a week were being distributed to each client. Clients were generally
single men and couples with mental health or drug and alcohol issues. On
occasions, referrals had been made for people from the Nepalese community and
food parcels had been prepared to meet their dietary requirements. It was
advised that most clients were regular users and came back again and again due
to ill health or financial issues.
The
Panel was advised that there were three people running The Larder at the
present time, but Mrs. Newton would be taking a step back in the future due to
other commitments. The Panel discussed the need for foodbank provision in
Aldershot and the huge undertaking by volunteers and space requirements to
provide a sustainable provision.
Mr. Shea talked to the Panel about the Trussell
Trust Farnborough Foodbank provision. It was advised that 3,356 families in
both Farnborough and Aldershot had received 33,000 meals during 2014, this
equalled three meals a day over a three day period for each person in the
family. It was noted that the Trust had tried to set up a satellite branch in
Aldershot, but unfortunately it hadn’t got the support it required to run
effectively, therefore the Farnborough Foodbank served a small number of
residents in Aldershot as well.
The
donated food was stored at the Brownings Barracks,
Aldershot, the building had no refrigeration facilities so only non-perishable
food stuffs were stored. It was noted that Costco had donated a lot of fresh
fruit and cakes on Fridays, which were then distributed to users on the same
day.
The
Trust had started a number of initiatives to support a wider range of needs,
these included:
·
Eat Well Spend Less
Course – sponsored by Unilever, this included cookery classes, supermarket
psychology and budgeting
·
Kitchen Starter Packs
– collection of household goods for people being housed for the first time
·
Cold Packs - aimed at the homeless population who had no
provision to heat/cook food
·
Kettle Packs – aimed
at users in bed and breakfast accommodation
with access to a kettle and/or microwave only
·
Clothing Packs – The
Trust held a store of children’s clothes for those in need
It was
advised that the lease on the Brownings Barracks had
been for seven years but it was stressed
that an exit strategy needed to be determined as the demand for foodbank
services was likely to increase in the future. The Panel also discussed the
lack of provision in Aldershot and the need to provide support to hard to reach
groups across the Borough. The complex issues surrounding the involvement of
the Jobcentre would be considered at the next mid cycle meeting.
The
Chairman thanked Mr. Beaton, Mrs Newton and Mr. Shea
for their contribution to the meeting.