To receive a
presentation from Mr. Peter Amies, Head of Community and Environment, on the
background and working arrangements of Meals on Wheels and the provision of
Luncheon Clubs in the Borough.
Minutes:
The
Head of Community and Environmental Services reported on the Meals on Wheels
and Luncheon Club services within the Borough:
(1)
Meals on Wheels –
It
was noted that, prior to 2013, the service had varied considerably across
Hampshire in the way it was delivered, the choice and the price. Levels of
financial contribution across districts had become unstable and Hampshire
County Council (HCC) took the decision to take over the provision and funding
to ensure consistency for its residents. HCC had increased their investment in
the service and appointed Apetito as the contractor.
The
service, delivered in vans that automatically heated the food at a certain
distance from its arrival point, was available to residents over 55 years and
the standard price for a two course lunch was £3.95 and £3.25 for afternoon
tea. The service had been extended to seven days a week and meal delivery in
Rushmoor had increased from 19,000 in 2013/14 to 26,000 in 2015/16, this
provided food for around 100 customers. However, the new service did not
provide the befriending element of the original service so a “Food and
Friendship Service” had been established.
Food
and Friendship was delivered by Age Concern Hampshire with support from Royal
Voluntary Services. The service provided company at meal times and was free to
Meals on Wheels customers between 11.30am and 4pm on weekdays. It was noted
that only six Rushmoor Meals on Wheels clients received weekly befriending
support. Clients were referred for the service through adult services,
relatives, friends/neighbours or GPs and all volunteers were trained to
identify malnutrition and general wellbeing issues. They also signposted
clients to luncheon clubs, helped with daily living and reduced social
isolation. The Council had agreed to a grant of £2,500 per annum for this
service, which at present required only £1,000 per annum to cover expenses. As
the service was in credit by almost £3,000 the grant had been withdrawn for the
time being but would be monitored closely to ensure the service continued.
(2)
Luncheon Clubs –
The
Panel noted that a club was held at the Farnborough Community Centre which was
hosted by Age Concern UK volunteers on a Tuesday and Friday. 34 residents
attended on a weekly basis at a cost of £4.50 for a two-course meal, and that a
local provider provided the meals. Additionally, outings and special meals at
Christmas time were organised at a small extra cost.
The
second club previously held at Place Court was now held at the Aldershot and
Fleet Rugby Club and was hosted by two paid staff from Age Concern Hampshire at
a salary cost of £5,000 per annum. The club ran on a Thursday between 11am and
3pm and currently had 15 people attending at a cost of between £3.50 –£4.00,
with others on a waiting list. It was hoped that numbers would increase to 20
but there were some issues with transport and the limited numbers the minibus
could carry. The Council provided a grant of £2,500 per annum which had been
matched by the dowry left over following the closure of the Elders Club to
cover the salary costs for the following seven years.
It
was noted that transport to both luncheon clubs had been provided by Rushmoor
Voluntary Services (RVS), in minibuses that were specially adapted and
accessible. The Council paid a grant of £10,000 per annum towards the cost of
RVS transport.
Overall,
the Council paid £13,500 per annum towards the running cost of the Luncheon
Clubs and Meals on Wheels befriending service, with savings of £42,000 having
been made in this area since 2015. £20,000 had been saved when HCC had taken
over control of the Meals on Wheels Service, £15,000 when the Aldershot
Luncheon Club had moved from the Elders Club to the Aldershot and Fleet Rugby
Club and £7,000 from a reduction in the grant to RVS for transport.
Concerns
were raised about the quality of the food provided by Apetito,
the state of the vans and the times the food was delivered. It was noted that
vans appeared grubby and in a state of disrepair. It was also noted that food
promised for between 1pm – 2pm had not been arriving until after 2.30pm, making
vulnerable clients wait, unacceptably, for their dinner. Data on customer
satisfaction and the number of complaints was requested, to be reviewed at the
following mid-cycle meeting. It was also reported that some of the local
nursing homes had appointed Apetito to provide the
lunches within their facilities; all the nursing homes had excellent kitchen
facilities but neither the staff nor funding to provide home cooked food for
their clients. Mr. Amies would make the views of the Panel known to Hampshire
County Council and report back.
It
was AGREED that:
Action to be taken |
By Whom |
When |
Data on customer
complaints and satisfaction of the Apetito Meals on
Wheels Service be collated and shared at the next mid-cycle meeting. |
Head of Community and
Environmental Services. |
August, 2016 |
The views of the Panel on
the service provided by Apetito in both the home
and within nursing homes be shared with Hampshire County Council with
comments reported back to the Panel at a future meeting. |
Head of Community and
Environmental Services. |
August, 2016 |