To receive any questions by Members to Cabinet Members submitted in accordance with the Procedure Note.
Minutes:
The Mayor reported
that five questions had been submitted for response by the Cabinet.
(1)
Cr.
M.J. Roberts asked a question of the Health and Housing Portfolio Holder
regarding the Council’s initial assessment of the need for additional fire
prevention measures for blocks of four storeys and over in the Borough.
In response, Cr. Hurst stated that joint
inspections had been carried out on two out of the four blocks of flats which
had been identified as high risk under the definition provided by the
Department of Communities and Local Government (i.e.
blocks of flats in excess of five storeys or 18 metres). The remaining had been scheduled for the
following week. The Council had decided
that all four and five storey residential blocks would be prioritised, using
the risk assessment information provided by the Borough’s registered
providers. Programmed inspections would
be made, the timing of which was dependent on the workload of the fire
authority.
Fire safety inspection, advice and education
fell within the remit of the Hampshire Fire and Rescue Service and the Council
would be guided by them in respect of the Council’s role. It exemplified the strength of the Council’s
partnership with the Service and the good track record of the joint response to
issues.
(2)
Cr.
A.H. Crawford asked a question of the Health and Housing Portfolio Holder
regarding the results of fire risk assessments and any recommendations of
Hampshire Fire and Rescue Service with respect to the blocks of offices which
had been converted to residential flats in the Borough and how this information
was being communicated to residents concerned, such as at Alexander House and
Stafford House in Station Road, Aldershot.
In response, Cr. Hurst confirmed that fire
risk assessments had been carried out at both Alexander House and Stafford
House in April 2017. The landlord,
Accent Housing, had provided copies of these to the Council. Whilst the risks identified in those
inspections had been minimal, officers (including housing and building control
officers), the fire officer and a representative of the Accent Group had
carried out a joint inspection earlier that day.
Cr. Hurst reported that both the buildings
were safe and did not pose any immediate fire risk to residents and this had
been confirmed by Hampshire Fire and Rescue Service. There were some minor issues around fire safety
signage and this was being addressed.
Hampshire Fire and Rescue Service had
advised the Leader of the Council that Rushmoor had been the first local
authority in Hampshire to request a joint inspection. The Service had been impressed with the speed
with which Rushmoor had initiated and responded to the request to carry out
these assessments.
In response to a supplementary question
about advising residents, Cr. Hurst confirmed that when the report was
published, it would be communicated to the residents of the buildings concerned.
(3)
Cr.
Jennifer Evans asked a question of the Health and Housing Portfolio Holder
regarding when the next emergency planning exercise would be carried out in
Rushmoor and asked if the organisers could focus this on a fire in a
multi-storey residential block of flats.
In response, Cr. Hurst advised that there
was currently no date for the next emergency planning exercise, although
Hampshire County Council was currently in the process of developing a
Hampshire-wide event to look at current issues.
Rushmoor would be part of that event.
In addition, Members were advised that the Council was in regular
contact with other districts and the County Council to share knowledge and
ensure that the response from the emergency services and local authorities was
effective and timely in the event of an emergency taking place.
Cr. Hurst stated that, at a national level,
there was Resilience Direct, which was a national secure online hub that
allowed authorities to share resilience information, work together and respond
effectively. Rushmoor was part of this
network and used it to support its local work.
(4)
Cr.
M.J. Roberts asked a question of the Health and Housing Portfolio Holder about
a review of risk strategy by the Council.
In response, Cr. Hurst stated that Rushmoor
had a set of risk management policies which ensured safety and continuity at
the Council’s premises. These were
regularly reviewed to take account of advice, guidance
and regulations. Regular reports were
provided by the Council’s health and safety adviser to identify issues and the
action being taken.
In relation to fire safety in registered
providers’ premises, it was noted that the Council was working closely with
Hampshire Fire and Rescue and would act on guidance from the Service. The Council would be holding registered
providers to account, working with the Homes and Communities Agency for the
properties they owned. All registered
providers had received communication from the Homes and Communities Agency
about obligations to comply with part 1.2b of the Regulations Home Standard
(Health and Safety). This issue could be
an area to be considered by a policy and review panel.
(5)
Cr.
M.J. Roberts asked a question of the Leader of the Council about representations
to be made by the Council via the Local Government Association for an immediate
suspension of further austerity cuts for local government.
In response, Cr. D.E. Clifford stated that
councils across the country were urging the suspension of further austerity
cuts and advised of the work being undertaken by the Local Government
Association in relation to this issue.