To carry out pre-decision scrutiny on the procurement and approval of an operator for the Aldershot Pools and Lido, Alpine Snowsports Centre and the proposed new Farnborough Leisure Centre, prior to consideration by the Cabinet at its meeting on 10th February, 2026 – Cabinet Report No. OS2603 (copy attached). Exempt appendices, referenced in the Report, will be available to Members of the Committee on Monday 2nd February by following this link.
David Phillips, Deputy Head of Operations, will give a short presentation.
The Portfolio Holder for Healthy Communities and Active Lives, Cllr Sophie Porter, will also be in attendance.
Minutes:
The Committee carried out pre-decision scrutiny on the
procurement and approval of an operator for the Aldershot Pools and Lido, Alpine
Snowsports Centre and the proposed new Farnborough Leisure Centre prior to
consideration by the Cabinet at its meeting on 10th February, 2026.
Report No. OS2603 set out the outcome of the Leisure
Operator procurement process which commenced in June 2025 and was assessed to
take account of both quality (60%) and cost (40%). Operators had the option to
bid on two different lots, a standard concession contract or an agency
agreement.
The Committee were provided with some background information
to the preferred operator, noting their purpose and values, health and
wellbeing programme, investment throughout the contract term, the added social
and environmental value, and financial deliverability and sustainability.
Members were also apprised of a number of risks, and the mitigations in place
to address these.
During discussions the Committee asked a number of
questions:
·
Can we guarantee that costs won’t be put on
residents through membership fees – it was noted that the preferred bidder had
proposed a pricing model to ensure equity of access and commercial performance.
Price increases would be aligned to industry best practice, benchmarked
annually against Sport England, comparators, and user feedback. Prices would be
reported to the Council for agreement annually.
·
What were the implications of targets not being
met – it was noted that the Council would retain an agreed minimum financial
return that was guaranteed.
·
What were the financial implications of a
mechanical or plant failure at the Lido – it was advised that responsibility
for maintenance of the lido plant would remain with the Council.
·
Car parking capacity at the Aldershot Pools and Lido
– this was an ongoing issue and was discussed as part of the process. It was
noted that additional parking had been made available in recent years with a
new lido overflow at the rear of the grounds (100 spaces), utilising a small
area of Aldershot Park (up to 100 spaces) and on rare occasions the Crematorium
car park (up to 50 spaces) for use in busy periods.
·
Due diligence, in particular holding to account
over promises of social value at procurement stage – it was noted that
provision would be included in the contract terms to cover areas such as social
value.
·
Procurement process costs – it was noted that
the Council had a contract with Portsmouth Council who carried out procurement
work with the Council’s officers.
·
Community outreach – some target areas had been
identified, in particular those areas of multiple deprivation, however, it was
noted that these were negotiable.
The Committee also discussed rebuilding relationships with
clubs, in particular the swimming and synchronised swimming clubs. It was
advised that the project team had been in contact with key stakeholders,
including these clubs, during the process.
ACTIONS:
|
What |
By Whom |
When |
|
Confirm any penalties for contract failure
by the operator? |
David Phillips – Deputy
Head of Operations |
ASAP |
|
Confirm whether the Council should ask the
preferred operator for a performance bond? |
David Phillips – Deputy
Head of Operations |
ASAP |
|
Confirm that appropriate balance sheet
checks had been undertaken for the preferred operator? |
David Phillips – Deputy Head of Operations |
ASAP |
Supporting documents: