5. |
Internal Audit Progress Report PDF 763 KB
To receive Southern Internal Audit Partnership’s (SIAP)
Report No. SIAP26/04 (copy attached), which includes the internal audit
progress report from the Council’s internal auditors, for the 2026/27 audit.
Minutes:
The Chairman welcomed Natalie Jerams, Deputy Head of
Southern Internal Audit Partnership (SIAP), and Nick Barrett, Audit Manager,
from the Council’s internal auditors, who joined the meeting remotely via
Microsoft Teams.
The Committee received SIAP’s Report No. SIAP26/04 which set
out the Internal Audit Progress Report, which provided the Audit and Governance
Committee with an overview of internal audit activity against assurance work completed
in accordance with the approved audit plan. The Report also provided an
overview of key updates pertinent to the discharge of the Committee’s role, in
relation to internal audit.
During discussion, Members raised questions regarding the
Disabled Facility Grants (DFG) audit and the Agency Staff audit. Members noted
that the limited assurance opinion for the Disabled Facilities Grants review
reflected areas where controls and processes needed to be strengthened. It was
also noted that the no assurance opinion for the Agency Staff review showed
concerns regarding procurement legislation and internal governance standards.
Further information on the Disabled Facilities Grants and Agency Staff audit
reviews would be provided by SIAP at the next Committee Meeting.
Members stated that they wished for clarification regarding
the legal requirements relating to Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) checks for
staff members. The Committee highlighted the need to ensure that risks
identified through internal audit reports, together with any overdue audit
actions, were appropriately considered within the Council's wider risk
management arrangements. Members also emphasised the importance of audit action
deadlines being met and noted that responsible officers could be required to
attend Committee meetings to explain delays and outline mitigations where
target dates had not been achieved. Members sought clarification that the
requirement was clear to officers.
Members also discussed whether greater access to information
from individual audit reports would support scrutiny, particularly for reviews
that had received low or no assurance opinions, and requested additional detail
where actions had been delayed.
ACTIONS:
|
What
|
By Whom
|
When
|
|
Provide Members with
further detail on the findings of the Disabled Facilities Grants and Agency
Staff audit reviews
|
Natalie Jerams - Deputy
Head of Southern Internal Audit Partnership
|
For the next Committee
meeting – 29th September
|
|
Review arrangements
with the Senior Leadership Team (SLT) to ensure that risks identified through
internal audit reports, together with any overdue audit actions, were
appropriately considered within the Council's wider risk management
arrangements
|
Amanda Bancroft –
Executive Head of Governance and Law
|
Before the next
Committee meeting – 29th September
|
|
Liaise with relevant officers
regarding attendance at committee meetings where target dates were revised,
and to report any revised dates in the next update.
|
Amanda Bancroft –
Executive Head of Governance and Law
Natalie Jerams – Deputy
Head of Southern Internal Audit Partnership
|
Before the next
Committee meeting – 29th September
|
|
Provide clarification
on the legal requirements relating to DBS checks, including the circumstances
in which councillors, employees and agency staff may require DBS clearance,
and the arrangements in place to identify and evidence compliance with those
requirements.
|
Amanda Bancroft –
Monitoring Officer
|
Before the next
Committee meeting ... view the full minutes text for item 5.
|
6. |
Freedom of Information - Annual Update Report 2026 PDF 300 KB
To receive the Executive Head of Governance & Law’s
Report No. LEG2602 (copy attached), which presents the Council’s performance on
Freedom of Information requests.
Minutes:
The Committee received the Executive Head of Governance and
Law’s Report No. LEG2602, which set out information about Freedom of
Information (FOI) requests received by the Council, and performance on
responses to FOIs.
The Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA 2000) provided
public access to information held by public authorities. Freedom of Information
requests encouraged openness and scrutiny of the Council’s decisions. Rushmoor Borough
Council had a statutory duty to fulfil its obligations under FOIA 2000.
The Committee noted that the Council’s performance on FOIs
continued to steadily improve and had been responding within the target
response rate. There was further work planned, including training, and
publishing more information online to further enhance improvements already
made. A new Microsoft Lists system had launched in Q2 of 2025 to improve
resilience, and increase oversight by senior management, this had contributed
to a positive improvement in response times.
RESOLVED: That officers:
(i)
continued the work on reducing the number of
overdue FOIs within the system in 2026 and continued to ensure that at least
90% of requests were responded to within the statutory 20 working days, per the
ICO target;
(ii)
continued to raise FOI awareness and knowledge
across employees, through regular training and guidance; and
(iii)
publish as much information proactively to reduce
the number of FOI requests.
|
7. |
Corporate Health and Safety Arrangements 2025/26 PDF 335 KB
To receive the Executive Director’s Report No. ED2613 (copy
attached), which sets out the corporate health and safety arrangements for
2025/26.
Minutes:
The Committee received the Executive Director’s Report No.
ED2613, which provided an update on the ongoing development and maintenance of
the Council’s corporate health and safety arrangements in 2025/26 and the plans
in place for 2026/27.
The overall health and safety risk profile of the Council
remained low, with the majority of high-risk work activity contracted out, only
a few specific roles had an enhanced level of risk. Examples of these were
technical staff working at Princes Hall and members of the Place Protection
team.
It was noted that, the Corporate Health and Safety Advisor
maintained a reporting regime on corporate health and safety matters that was
taken quarterly to the Senior Leadership Team (SLT). This related predominately
to operational matters. The numbers of accidents/incidents and violence at work
incidents, including trends and a summary of those reports, was routinely reported
to SLT and Cabinet via the quarterly performance management reporting process.
The number of accidents and incidents seen at the Council was low and had
remained relatively stable for a number of years, with a total number of 22 in
2025/26.
During discussion, Members sought clarification of the
meaning of ‘Other’, with regard to reported incidents. Members noted that
‘Other’ referred to incidents reported by third parties, such as the police and
other agencies. Members acknowledged measures in place to protect staff from
abusive and challenging behaviour, including training, incident reporting
procedures, access to counselling through the Employee Assistance Programme
(EAP) and the involvement of the police, where necessary. Members were advised
that staff perceptions of safety were monitored through regular staff surveys
and that efforts continued to secure Trade Union Health and Safety
representation at the Council.
ACTION:
|
What
|
By Whom
|
When
|
|
Clarify on future
reports, that ‘Other’ refers to third party reporting of incidents.
|
Roger Sanders, Service
Manager – Risk, Performance and Procurement
|
July 2027
|
RESOLVED: That
the Executive Director’s Report No. ED2613, be noted.
|
8. |
Treasury Management and Non-Treasury Investment Operations and Prudential Indicators - Outturn 2025-26 and Q1 2026/27 PDF 596 KB
To receive the Executive Head of Finance’s Report No.
FIN2615 (copy attached), which sets out the activities of the Treasury
Management and Non-Treasury Management Investment Operations for 2025/26
outturn (as at 31st March, 2026) and compliance with prudential indicators.
Minutes:
The Committee considered items 5 and 6 on the agenda
together.
Treasury Management and Non-Treasury Investment
Operations and Prudential Indicators - Outturn 2025-26
The Committee received the Executive Head of Finance Report
No. FIN2615, which set out the draft activities of the Treasury Management and
non-Treasury Investment Operations for Quarter 4, in the financial year
2025/26, and reported on compliance with Prudential Indicators, pending the statement
of accounts being signed off by the Council’s external auditors. The report was
a statutory requirement under the Chartered Institute of Public Finance
Accountants (CIPFA) Code of Practice on Treasury Management.
The Committee were advised that all activity was conducted
within the approved Treasury Management Practices (TMPs). Borrowing maturity
had moved towards longer term to give cost certainty and lower interest rate
exposure risk, providing more interest rate stability on borrowing.
The Committee RECOMMENDED TO THE CABINET that the
Executive Head of Finance Report No. FIN2615, in relation to the treasury
management and non-treasury investment operations carried out, be approved.
Treasury Management and Non-Treasury Investment
Operations and Prudential Indicators - Q1 2026/27
The Committee received the Executive Head of Finance Report
No. FIN2616, which set out the activities of the Treasury Management and
non-Treasury Investment Operations for Quarter 1 in the financial year 2026/27 and
reported on compliance with Prudential Indicators. The report was a statutory
requirement under the CIPFA Code of Practice on Treasury Management.
The Committee noted that all treasury activity had been
conducted within the approved Treasury Management Practices. Borrowing maturity
had moved towards longer term to give cost certainty and lower interest rate
exposure risk, providing more interest rate stability on borrowing.
During discussion, Members raised questions regarding the Council's
remaining short-term borrowing and whether it would be converted to longer-term
borrowing. Officers advised that borrowing arrangements were reviewed regularly
and that some short-term borrowing currently represented the most
cost-effective approach. In response to a question about Union Yard, Members
noted that the sale of Blocks C and D to Vivid, was due to be completed on 31st
August.
The Committee RECOMMENDED TO THE CABINET that the contents
of the Executive Head of Finance’s Report No. FIN2616, in relation to the
Treasury Management and non-Treasury Investment Operations carried out, be
approved.
|
9. |
Unaudited Statement of Accounts and Annual Governance Statement PDF 2 MB
To consider the Executive Head of Finance’s Report No.
FIN2614 (copy attached), which presents the unaudited 2025/26 Statement of
Accounts and the Annual Governance Statement for review and approval.
Minutes:
The Committee considered item 7 on the agenda, the Unaudited
Statement of Accounts and the Annual Governance Statement, separately.
The Committee received the Executive Head of Finance’s
Report No. FIN2614, which set out, the unaudited Statement of Accounts for
2025/26, for review.
The Committee noted that the preparation of the Statement of
Accounts and the audit scrutiny provided reassurance that the accounts gave a
true and fair view of the financial position of the Council. Members’ role in
approval was to demonstrate their ownership of the Statement of Accounts and
their confidence in both the Chief Finance Officer and the process by which the
accounting records were maintained and the Statement of Accounts prepared.
The Accounts and Audit Regulations 2015 stated that, for
each financial year, the Council must conduct a review of the effectiveness of
the Council’s internal control and prepare an annual governance statement for
review and approval by the Committee prior to it being signed by the Chief
Executive and Leader of the Council. The statement would then be finalised with
the signed Statement of Accounts.
Members were advised that the Statement of Accounts had been
published in accordance with statutory requirements and was currently subject
to external audit. The first phase of the audit was nearing completion, with
further audit work scheduled to take place in September.
The Committee were informed that, given the technical nature
of the accounts, an informal workshop would be arranged in September or October
to provide Members with an overview of the Statement of Accounts, explain the
key issues and consider the findings of the External Auditor once available.
ACTION:
|
What
|
By Whom
|
When
|
|
Arrange a workshop to provide Members with an overview of
the Statement of Accounts.
|
Peter Vickers, Executive Head of Finance.
|
September or October 2026
|
RESOLVED: That the unaudited Statement of Accounts,
be noted.
|
10. |
Annual Governance Statement
Minutes:
The Committee considered item 7 on the agenda, the Unaudited
Statement of Accounts and the Annual Governance Statement, separately.
The Committee received the Executive Head of Finance’s
Report No. FIN2614, which set out the Annual Governance Statement for 2025/26,
for approval.
The Report set out the procedure for compiling the Annual
Governance Statement and the requirements of the Committee to ensure a meaningful
review of the Annual Governance Statement. Members were reminded that they
needed to be satisfied that the Annual Governance Statement reflected the
governance environment and any actions required to improve it. Members also had to be satisfied that it
demonstrated how governance supported the achievement of the Council’s
objectives.
During discussion, Members sought clarification regarding a
reference to the Corporate Governance Group being on "hiatus" and were
advised that the group was currently on hold pending a review of its terms of
reference. Members questioned the use of procedural exemptions and suggested
that the operation of these governance processes be reviewed through future
Internal Audit work.
ACTION:
|
What
|
By Whom
|
When
|
|
Consider the operation and use of exemptions to normal
decision-making procedures, as part of future Internal Audit work on
governance arrangements.
|
Amanda Bancroft – Executive Head of Governance and Law and
Natalie Jerams - Southern Internal Audit Partnership (SIAP)
|
Before the next Committee meeting – 29th September
|
RESOLVED: That the Annual Governance Statement, be
approved.
|
11. |
Status of the Financial Recovery Working Group
To receive a verbal update from the Executive Head of
Finance regarding the status of the Financial Recovery Working Group.
Minutes:
The Committee received a verbal update on the Council's
financial position and the arrangements that had been put in place to monitor
delivery of the Budget Strategy.
Members were advised that a Financial Recovery Working Group
had been established, following the approval of the Council’s budget in February
2025, to oversee the delivery of actions required to return the budget to a
balanced position. It was noted that the majority of these actions had now been
completed, with only a small number of capital receipt matters remaining
outstanding.
The Committee noted that, following the announcement of
Local Government Reorganisation (LGR), the Council's financial strategy had
changed. Rather than pursuing further service reductions, the focus was on
maintaining service delivery, preparing for the new authority and ensuring that
the Council remained financially sustainable until Vesting Day. Members were
advised that monthly budget monitoring reports were the primary mechanism for
managing financial risks and monitoring progress against the strategy.
During discussion, Members expressed concern regarding the
Council's ongoing financial risks and emphasised the importance of regular Member
oversight. It was confirmed that financial sustainability was included within
the Council's corporate risk register. Members agreed that the Council's
financial position would benefit from more regular Member scrutiny and oversight.
Consequently, the Committee supported a proposal that Cabinet establish a
politically balanced Member working group, meeting monthly for the remainder of
the Council's term, to review the Council’s financial management. The Chair
advised that the recommendation would be raised with the Leader of the Council
and, if it was not progressed by the Cabinet, it would be taken to Council.
ACTION:
|
What
|
By Whom
|
When
|
|
Write to the Leader of the Council, to recommend to the Cabinet
to set up a Working Group to review the Council’s financial management.
|
Cllr Bill O’Donovan – Chair of Audit and Governance
Committee
|
Before the next Cabinet meeting – 4th August
|
The Committee RECOMMENDED TO THE CABINET that the
Cabinet establish a politically balanced Member Working Group, meeting monthly
for the remainder of the Council's term, to review financial management.
|
|