Venue: Remote Meeting - Link to view the meeting is below
Contact: Chris Todd, Democracy and Community on 01252 398825 or e-mail: chris.todd@rushmoor.gov.uk
No. | Item |
---|---|
To confirm the Minutes of the meeting held on 2nd June, 2020 (copy attached). Minutes: The Minutes of the meeting of the Cabinet held on 2nd June, 2020 were confirmed. |
|
RUSHMOOR BOROUGH COUNCIL BUSINESS PLAN - 2020/23 PDF 391 KB To consider Report No. DCS2001 (copy attached), which seeks approval of the Council’s three year Business Plan, for submission to the Council on 30th July, 2020. Presented By: Cllr Adrian Newell, Democracy, Strategy and Partnerships Portfolio Holder Minutes: The Cabinet
considered Report No. DCS2001, which set out proposed updates to the Council’s
three year business plan. Members were informed that the business plan would build on the sixteen priorities that had been identified by the Cabinet and that supported the Council’s Vision for Aldershot and Farnborough 2030. Members were informed that the business plan would be presented at the Council Meeting on 30th July, 2020. In response to a question, it was confirmed that Members would be informed of any priority areas that had been seriously impacted by the Covid-19 pandemic.
The Cabinet RECOMMENDED TO THE COUNCIL that the Rushmoor Borough Council Business Plan (April 2020 to March 2023), as set out in Report No. DCS2001, be approved. |
|
FARNBOROUGH LEISURE AND CIVIC HUB – APPROVAL OF OUTLINE BUSINESS CASE AND NEXT STEPS PDF 4 MB To consider Report No. RP2009 (copy attached), which sets out a proposal to carry out a detailed feasibility study for the potential development of a combined leisure centre and civic hub, within the proposed Farnborough Civic Quarter. Presented By: Cllr Martin Tennant, Major Projects and Property Portfolio Holder Additional documents:
Minutes: The
Cabinet considered Report No. RP2009, which sought additional funding to
proceed with a detailed feasibility study for the potential development of a combined
leisure centre and civic hub within the Farnborough Civic Quarter site. Members were reminded that a capital budget of
£100,000 for the commissioning of a feasibility study in relation to the
potential development of a new leisure centre had been agreed previously by the
Cabinet. It was now proposed that the scope of the feasibility study should be
broadened to consider the creation of a new civic hub as part of the
development. This would require the establishment of a further budget of up to
£100,000. Members were informed that the Council had appointed GLK Solutions to
work with officers to produce the Outline Business Case appended to the Report.
The Cabinet considered the details of the business
case and was supportive of the approach suggested. In particular, Members
discussed issues around the condition of the existing council offices and the
requirement for the Council to reduce its carbon footprint over the coming
years. The Cabinet RESOLVED that (i)
the
Outline Business Case, as set out in Appendix A to Report No. RP2009, be
approved; (ii)
the recommendations, as set out in paragraph 3.4 of
the Report and in accordance with the Outline Business Case, be approved; and (iii)
a
further budget of up to £100,000 to support the delivery of the feasibility
study, as set out in paragraph 4.5 of the Report, be approved. |
|
REGENERATING RUSHMOOR PROGRAMME - UNION STREET, ALDERSHOT REGENERATION SCHEME PDF 151 KB To consider Report No. RP2011 (copy attached), which sets out an update in relation to the redevelopment of Union Street, Aldershot. Presented By: Cllr Martin Tennant, Major Projects and Property Portfolio Holder Minutes: The Cabinet considered Report No. RP2011, which set out an update on
progress in relation to the Union Street, Aldershot redevelopment site. Members were informed that planning permission had been granted for the
scheme in June, 2020. Approval was now required to carry out the necessary
demolition and clearance works to maintain the development timetable. This
would enable the Council to secure the external grant funding that had been
secured against the scheme and would ensure the timely delivery of the agreed
student accommodation to the University for the Creative Arts. In response to a question, it was confirmed that the exercise to select a demolition contractor would be subject to
appropriate procurement practices and would be Official Journal of the European
Union (OJEU) compliant. Members also discussed the importance of securing the
external funding to offset the overall cost of the scheme. The Cabinet RESOLVED that (i)
the update on the due
diligence being undertaken and the proposed decision making process, as set out
in Report No. RP2011, be noted; (ii)
the progression of the
demolition of the site, including the procurement of demolition services and
the awarding of contracts (up to £1.25 million) through an appropriate
framework, to clear and prepare the site for construction as soon as
practicable, be approved; (iii)
the meeting of the
demolition and site clearance costs from the capital budgets already set aside
for the regeneration of Union Street, Aldershot be approved; (iv)
the establishment of an
internal (client) project team be noted and the appointment of other advisers
and the procurement of advice, as necessary, to complete the due diligence
process and support the demolition and clearance of the site be approved, with
the costs being met from budgets already agreed for the regeneration programme; (v)
in
relation to planning application no. 20/00171/FULPP, the entering into
the necessary legal agreement(s) in relation to the planning obligations set
out in Section 4.4 to secure planning consent in a timely manner be approved; (vi)
the appointment of external solicitors to
progress the Agreement for Lease and associated documents with the University
for the Creative Arts be noted; and (vii)
the formal approval by the Enterprise M3 LEP of
grant funding of £1.2 million be noted. |
|
EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC To consider resolving: That, subject to the public interest test, the public be excluded from this meeting during the discussion of the undermentioned item to avoid the disclosure of exempt information within the paragraph of Schedule 12A to the Local Government Act, 1972 indicated against such item: Item Schedule Category No. 12A Para. No. 6 3 Information
relating to financial or business affairs Minutes: RESOLVED: That, taking into account the public interest test, the public be
excluded from the meeting during the discussion of the under mentioned item to avoid
the disclosure of exempt information within the paragraph of Schedule 12A to
the Local Government Act, 1972 indicated against the item: Minute Schedule Category No. 12A Para. No. 12 3 Information relating to
financial or business affairs |
|
THE FOLLOWING ITEM WAS CONSIDERED |
|
UNION STREET, ALDERSHOT REGENERATION - LAND ASSEMBLY To consider Exempt Report No. RP2010 (copy attached), which sets out proposals to secure the vacant possession of land within the Union Street, Aldershot regeneration site. Presented By: Cllr Martin Tennant, Major Projects and Property Portfolio Holder Minutes: The Cabinet considered Exempt Report No. RP2010, which set out proposals
to secure the vacant possession of land within the Union Street, Aldershot
regeneration site. Members were informed of the circumstances around two properties within
the site. In each case, the legal position of the properties had been complex
and this had led to protracted negotiations with the occupiers. It was,
however, in the Council’s interests to secure vacant possession to enable
progress to be made in delivering the redevelopment project plan. Members were
supportive of the approach proposed and considered that the regeneration of
this site remained one of the Council’s key priorities. Officers were
authorised to negotiate with the occupiers to obtain vacant possession, within
prescribed limits. The Cabinet RESOLVED that i)
in order to make progress with the demolition of the site
and with the implementation of the planning permission obtained, Council
officers be authorised to secure vacant possession of the properties, as set
out in Exempt Report No. RP2010, by negotiation up to the limits agreed at the
meeting and set out in the Restricted Minute appended; and ii)
the setting aside of a revenue budget for temporary
holding costs, as set out in paragraphs 5.4–5.5 of the Exempt Report, be
approved. |