Venue: Council Offices, Farnborough
Contact: Panel Administrator, Justine Davie Tel. (01252) 398832, Email. justine.davie@rushmoor.gov.uk
No. | Item | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
To confirm the Minutes of the Meeting held on 8th November, 2016 (copy attached). Minutes: The Minutes of the Meeting held on 8th November, 2016 were approved and signed by the Chairman, subject to the inclusion of an additional sentence at the end of the Recycling Levels in Rushmoor item to say ‘The Chairman noted that nothing was being done by the Cabinet to address the low recycling levels in Rushmoor’. |
||||||||||
DEMOLITION OF BUILDINGS AND DANGEROUS STRUCTURES The Building Control
Partnership Manager and Environmental Health Manager to report on the
procedures, and roles and responsibilities, for dealing with dangerous
structures and demolition of buildings in the Borough, and clarify the extent
to which Rushmoor Borough Council has power to act. Minutes: Martin Hobley, Building Control Partnership Manager, and
Colin Alborough, Environmental Health Manager, at Rushmoor Borough Council
reported on the procedures, roles and responsibilities for dealing with
dangerous structures and demolition of buildings in the Borough. The Panel was advised that, if a structure
larger than 50 cubic metres was required to be demolished. Section 80 of the Building Act required the
applicant to serve a notice on the Council.
The Council would respond within six weeks with a Section 81 notice
which would include the requirements with which the applicant had to
comply. The Panel was advised that
regulation of health and safety on a demolition site was the responsibility of
the Health and Safety Executive (HSE). In
terms of the Council’s duties with regard to dangerous structures, any
structure that could present a danger to the public would require the Council
to either contact the owner to rectify or in an emergency the Council would
arrange to make the site safe. The
Council could apply to the Magistrates’ Court under Section 77 to serve a
notice on the owner requiring them to make the structure safe or in extreme
cases could act themselves under Section 78 which allowed the Council to take
immediate action. There had been issues with the demolition of a building recently with which the Council and HSE had both been involved. The matters regarding health and safety were now in the hands of the HSE to investigate. The Panel discussed the position of the Council on making
buildings safe and the process for the demolition of buildings. It was requested that, in future, when works
were being carried out by individuals that had not followed procedures in the
past, careful monitoring should be carried out. The Panel NOTED the presentation. |
||||||||||
ALDERSHOT CATCHMENT STUDY PDF 335 KB Sophie Slade from
Thames Water Utilities to attend the meeting to advise the Panel on the
Aldershot Catchment study being carried out to look at
improving the drainage arrangements. Minutes: Sophie Slade, Paul Bowring and Gian
Illari attended the Panel meeting, on behalf of
Eight2O, to report on the Aldershot Catchment Study. Eight20 was an alliance made up of eight
companies set up to deliver elements of Thames Water’s investment programme. Thames
Water had a five year plan that would help save over
2,100 properties that currently suffered from sewer flooding. In addition to the five
year plan, funding had been secured to undertake five catchment studies
to investigate whether more properties could be protected, one of which was the
Aldershot Catchment Study. The Panel was advised that
flooding had occurred at a number of key locations across the Aldershot
catchment area during numerous historical storm events due to the incapacity of
the surface water sewer network. A wide
range of options had been investigated to reduce the
risk of flooding in key flooding areas in Aldershot. Preferred solutions had
been identified and work was being undertaken to assess the feasibility
of the schemes. A proposed scheme had been designed to address
flooding at 50 properties in the vicinity of Manor
Park. The scheme involved implementing a
range of sustainable attenuation features in and around Manor Park. The proposed scheme would require close collaboration
with both Rushmoor Borough Council and Hampshire County Council to ensure the
design offered maximum benefit to stakeholders and local residents. The Aldershot Catchment Study would
be completed in March/April 2017.
The study assessment and costings would then be
completed and outline drawings and calculations produced. An Integrated Catchment Strategy would be
produced which would recommend the sequential implementation of the proposed
options and provide a long-term strategy for the catchment to address remaining
flooding issues. Thames Water would seek
an agreement in principle for ownership and maintenance of proposed drainage
features should the scheme progress further. The Panel discussed the Aldershot Catchment Study
work that was being carried out and the proposed
scheme. Regular updates to the Panel were requested to monitor the progress of the work. The Panel suggested a number of areas that
had flooding issues but were advised that all schemes
had to be assessed and the cost benefit calculated. Schemes would only proceed if they were
feasible and cost effective. It was expected that the modelling for any schemes that were
not included in the Thames Water programme could be shared with the Council. The Panel NOTED the presentation
|
||||||||||
LEAD LOCAL FLOOD AUTHORITY PDF 501 KB Clare Mills,
Flood and Water Manager from Hampshire County Council, the Lead Local Flood
Authority, to advise the Panel on the flood work being
carried out in Rushmoor and future plans. Minutes: Clare Mills,
Flood and Water Manager from Hampshire County Council (HCC), the Lead Local
Flood Authority (LLFA), attended the Panel meeting to report on the role of the
LLFA and the approach being taken within
Hampshire. The Flood and Water
Management Act 2010 placed a number of responsibilities on the LLFA and there were a number of statutory requirements that were either a
power or duty to undertake. There
were a number of other agencies with a flood management role including the
Environment Agency, water companies, highway authority and the planning
authority. The LLFA role included: ·
Co-ordinating the
management of flooding from surface water, ground water and ordinary
watercourses; ·
Investigating
flooding; ·
Approving works to
watercourses; and, ·
Enforcement of
unconsented works or lack of maintenance works on ordinary watercourses. The Local Flood
Risk Management Strategy had been adopted by HCC in July 2013 together with the
associated high level action plans. A review of the Strategy was underway and
expected to be completed in early 2018. The approach in Hampshire was a more
catchment based approach to flooding to better co-ordinate work and maximise
the availability of funding. Work had been commissioned to look at all flood risk within the
catchments of Hampshire. Once complete,
a programme for the catchment plans would be developed. The flood risk schemes within Rushmoor were
located at Middleton Gardens, Sycamore Road and Rectory Road in Farnborough;
two further schemes had also been included in the unfunded pipeline programme
for 2021/22 onwards. All funding
allocations in the programme remained unsecured until agreement of a full
business case for any proposed scheme had been granted. Partnership funding was required to enable
national funding to be released. The Panel
discussed the programme of schemes and proposed some additional areas that had
suffered problems with flooding. A
response on specific areas was not able to be given at
the meeting but details would be investigated and reported back to the Panel. The Panel NOTED the presentation.
|
||||||||||
To note the Panel’s current work programme (copy attached). Minutes: The Panel was asked to advise the Panel
Administrator of any items to be considered for the 11th April Panel meeting by
7th March. The Panel NOTED the current work programme. |